But then I thought: "Ok, so I take a bunch of free, non-free stuff for granted, but why?" This is when I realized what it was; the society, at least the part of it that I belong to, has been tainted by the extreme commercialism of the '90s and formed a communalist system. Not that it's really all that noble or anything (since it's driven by personal greed and rationalization,) but people in my generation typically work on the premise that anything non-consumable and easily duplicated should be shared. This includes music, software, ideas, etc. This would explain why I expected the Blogger and Live Journal systems to be free, why music/game piracy is so rampant, and the entire open source community (of which I am both a giver and a taker.)
But this poses a problem, as with any social revolution, the communalist viewpoint is the exact antithesis of the commercialist view, just like the prudishness of the '50s created the sexual revolution in the '60s. The problem is that both systems, at least for the moment, must coexist. So what can we do to help these two differing view points cooperate until one of them becomes the dominant social viewpoint? I think that answering that might be the biggest challenge facing our generation. And as for me, I have no good ideas.
P2P vs. 401(K) in an all out battle to the Bank!
Mood: Contemplative.